Trauma & Fractures

Clavicle (Collarbone) Fractures

Evidence-based guide to diagnosis, treatment options, and recovery

Understanding Clavicle Fractures

The clavicle (collarbone) is the most commonly fractured bone in the body, accounting for 2.5-5% of all fractures. It connects the arm to the body and protects vital structures underneath.

Epidemiology: Peak incidence in young males (sports/accidents) and elderly females (falls). 80% occur in the middle third (midshaft), 15% in the lateral (distal) third, and 5% in the medial third.

Mechanism: Most commonly from a fall onto the shoulder (87%) or direct blow. The classic presentation is a painful, swollen, drooping shoulder after trauma.

Classification (Allman/Neer)

Group I: Midshaft (80%)

• Most common location

• Good healing potential

• Usually non-operative

• Surgery if displaced >2cm

Group II: Distal (15%)

• Higher nonunion rate

• May involve AC joint

• Type II most unstable

• Often needs surgery

Group III: Medial (5%)

• Least common

• Usually stable

• Near vital structures

• Mostly non-operative

Treatment Options

Treatment based on Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) trial, Edinburgh studies, and AAOS guidelines.

FIRST LINENon-Operative Treatment

Indications: Non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures, medial third fractures, patients with low functional demands, or high surgical risk.

Protocol:

• Sling for comfort (2-4 weeks)

• Early gentle range of motion as pain allows

• Progressive strengthening from 6 weeks

• Full activity by 12 weeks if healed

Success Rate: 85-95% union rate for appropriately selected cases. Most patients return to full function.

SURGICALOperative Treatment

Indications:

• Displaced midshaft fractures (>2cm shortening)

• Open fractures or skin tenting

• Neurovascular compromise

• Floating shoulder (ipsilateral scapula neck fracture)

• Distal clavicle fractures with CC ligament disruption

Surgical Options:

Plate Fixation: Superior or anteroinferior plating. Gold standard for displaced midshaft fractures. 95-98% union rate.

Intramedullary Fixation: Titanium elastic nail or rigid nail. Less soft tissue stripping. Good for simple patterns.

Potential Complications

Non-Operative Risks

• Nonunion: 15-20% (displaced fractures)

• Malunion with shortening

• Cosmetic bump

• Persistent pain (rare)

Surgical Risks

• Nonunion: 2-5%

• Infection: 1-2%

• Hardware irritation: 10-30%

• Scar (visible location)

Scientific References

1. Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS). Nonoperative vs operative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. JBJS 2007

2. Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult. JBJS Br 1998

3. McKee MD, et al. Operative versus nonoperative care of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. JBJS 2012

Last Updated: January 2025 | Content reviewed by Dr. Deepthi Nandan Reddy, FRCS (Ortho)

Frequently Asked Questions

Consult Dr. Deepthi Nandan Reddy – Shoulder Specialist

Get expert diagnosis and personalized treatment for your shoulder condition. Book your consultation today.

Visit drdnreddyortho.com for appointments and complete profile

Made with Emergent